Responsibility and Accountability

by | Leadership

The concepts of “responsibility” and “accountability” are fundamental to understanding Canada’s system of “responsible government.” This post explains these concepts and shows what they look like in practice.

Ministerial responsibility is a defining feature of the Westminster system

Ministers are assigned individual responsibility through statute (e.g. the National Defence Act, the Department of Health Act, etc.) or by the prime minister (e.g. usually, through a letter).  Responsibility implies the authority to take necessary action. As public servants supporting a minister in exercising his or her responsibilities, we need to be aware of what those responsibilities are exactly—at least with respect to our area of work.

Accountability implies that there will be an assessment of how responsibilities have been fulfilled

When we are assigned responsibilities, it is normally clear who will be assessing how well we have done our job. While we are responsible for things, we are accountable to a person (or group of people). Ministers are accountable to Parliament; that is, they must be able to provide answers to Parliament regarding how they have acted in their area of responsibility.  Mechanisms for doing so are Question Period and Order Paper Questions (questions submitted in writing by a Member of Parliament).

Ministers are also accountable to the prime minister, as the person who appoints them and who may also reassign responsibilities.

Cabinet is also collectively responsible for the actions of the government

Cabinet is collectively accountable to Parliament (which through its votes, will indicate its assessment of the government). Of course, in an election, citizens also vote to reflect, at least to some degree, their assessment of the government’s past actions.

The people to whom a minister is accountable influence his or her frame of reference

Public servants provide advice to ministers and implement decisions. That advice needs to be framed in terms of what is of concern to ministers—namely, how to effectively fulfill their responsibilities, how Parliament, the prime minister or citizens will view their actions, as well as the means by which they will be held to account. A good briefing note for a minister will be written with awareness of that context.

Similarly, when public servants are implementing decisions (e.g. administering a program), they need to remember that the minister can be held to account for those decisions as well. How money is spent is a particular focus of attention for Parliament and therefore ministers in this regard. For this reason, when implementation deviates from what has been approved (e.g. costs are increasing or implementation is delayed), informing the minister quickly, outlining corrective action and, if appropriate, seeking to revisit what had been approved is the way to support ministers in fulfilling their responsibilities.

To what extent can you see how your responsibilities are linked to those of your minister?